Many states across the nation are moving to either strengthen their existing
statutory language that recognizes marriage between a man and a woman or to
amend their constitution to preserve the traditional meaning of marriage. The
information on this page is intended to reflect the breadth of the movement to
defend marriage throughout the United States.
Forty-three
states currently have statutory language recognizing traditional
marriage. Because states are concerned that their laws may not stand up
to legal challenge before activist judges, twenty-two state legislatures
are taking action to protect marriage, either through the statutory
amendment process, constitutional amendment process, or passage of a
non-binding resolution urging Congress to pass a federal constitutional
amendment.
The national
map above is linked to a database of state laws and constitutional
provisions that protect marriage. It also tracks the marriage-protecting
measures that are being considered in state legislatures.
Taking a cue
from the passage of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 1996,
many states moved to protect marriage in their state codes in the late
1990s. While all of these states adopted language similar to the federal
DOMA, there is some variation. This chart breaks down the federal DOMA
language into its componenents and tracks what language was used by
which states. States incorporating more components benefit from stronger
the statutory language. Examples of states with strong marriage statutes
are Alabama, Georgia, Michigan, and Ohio. States with weaker marriage
statutes include Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, South Dakota, and
Vermont. Some states had already defined marriage in their state
statutes prior to the passage of the federal DOMA. These states are
Maryland, New Hampshire, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Vermont passed a
statute in 1999 defining marriage between one man and one woman. It
should also be noted that Connecticut’s common law recognizes marriage
as between a man and a woman.
Regardless of
whether or not a state has laws or constitutional provisions
specifically defining marriage or prohibiting same sex marriage, all
states have consanguinity laws, prohibiting individuals from marrying
their blood relations. Many states specifically prohibit a male from
marrying his female blood relations and females from marrying her male
blood relations. Inherent in these laws is the understanding that
marriage is between a man and a woman.
Click on the
map below to read comments from your U.S. Senator about the proposed
Federal Marriage Amendment. You will also find information about how
they voted on the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 1996.
This database tracks only current state laws and
the actions of state legislatures. There are several court cases pending
that could potentially redefine marriage by judicial decree. The
Alliance Defense Fund
is involved in many of these court cases. The
Family Research Council
and
Marriage Law Project
track them.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Charissa Kersten. "Marriage in the 50 States." The Heritage Foundation
(July, 2004).
This information has been compiled and is being updated by
Charissa Kersten and is based on official state
websites and information provided by
www.stateline.org. It is reprinted here with
permission from The Heritage Foundation.
Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational
institute — a think tank — whose mission is to formulate and promote
conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited
government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong
national defense.
THE AUTHOR
Charissa Kersten is program coordinator of the Heritage Foundation's Center for
American Studies where she is a research assistant and events
planner/coordinator.