Bishop Robert Vasa
Several years ago I had the opportunity, while visiting Washington, DC, to
observe the changing of the guard at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at
Arlington National Cemetery.
I
was so struck by the simple, deliberate elegance of the ceremony that I
stayed for extra minutes simply to watch the young man march to and fro with
that same simple, deliberate elegance. The uniforms were absolutely
impeccable, the shoes shined to pure gloss, the faces of the guards set like
granite, the measured steps precise, the entire person focused on the job at
hand. It was clear from all of the above that the young men knew that what
they were about was serious and important.
I
have reflected repeatedly on the Arlington experience as it relates to what
we do in our Catholic Churches. The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is the most
significant event in the world. As the priest and ministers enter the church
and proceed down the aisle, there is not the expectation that they imitate
the guards at Arlington, but it would be most appropriate to do so. The
guard at Arlington processes solemnly in front of a tomb of national
significance, and he is rightfully dignified. Every altar in every Catholic
Church has eternal significance and deserves a regard greater than that
demanded by the national tomb.
I
am not advocating a religious solemnity devoid of joy or humanity, but it
appears that Arlington may have something which the Catholic Church needs.
The dignity manifested by the guard points towards and accentuates the
dignity of the place. Silence is observed at the National Tomb. Silence is a
sign of respect for the place and the meaning of the place. Silence is
appropriate and enforced vigorously there. Order is enforced there.
As
I stood watching the guard making his seemingly routine and non-variable
march, he suddenly broke out of line two steps at an angle to his right. He
removed the rifle from his shoulder, held it in his hands, and said very
forcefully, "Stay behind the barrier!" A couple of seconds later, he
repeated the command, at which a woman who had crossed into forbidden
territory to get a better picture retreated to the area reserved for
visitors. He then returned to his line and resumed his march. No apology, no
explanation; the sign said "No Trespassing"; what part of "No" was not
understood?
The
trespass onto sacred secular soil was deemed unacceptable. The dignity of
the place demanded order and an observance of that order. Once again, I do
not advocate this kind of rigid, cold enforcement, but the dignity of our
churches needs to be fostered and preserved. The dignity of this sacred
place will be lost as the sacredness of the area around the tomb would
quickly be lost, if there is not a decided effort to preserve it.
Wouldn't it be cute if four or six little 5-year-olds dressed up like
Marines and marched back and forth with the guard? It might be cute, but it
would not befit the dignity of the place or the solemnity of the occasion.
Yet time and again, we try to introduce people and behaviors into our
churches which are deemed "cute" and therefore somehow mandatory. I suggest
that "cute" has its place, but Arlington National Cemetery is not one of
them, and neither are our churches which house Jesus Himself, Body, Blood,
Soul and Divinity.
Several years ago, the Holy Father reinstituted a dress code for the
churches of Rome, his diocese. No one in shorts or sleeveless shirts was to
be admitted into the church building.
An
American sense of rights and freedom rebels against such rules, calling them
absurdities. Yet it was done and it was enforced. Tourists who had traveled
across an ocean to see a church were turned back at the door unless they
were properly attired. This was only to visit a church while no other
liturgical action was going on. The Holy Father saw a need to institute a
policy aimed at restoring, in a very concrete way, a proper sense of
reverence for the house of God.
I
have often heard the argument that the administrators of churches should be
pleased to see that people come, regardless of how they are dressed. The
other side of that is that people need to demonstrate in word and deed the
proper disposition and attitude. I am certain the American people would be
rightfully chagrined if the guard at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier were to
show up in plaid shorts, a tank top and half-laced tennis shoes. It is hard
to imagine that he could have a proper interior attitude to the job at hand
were he to come to "work" dressed like that.
Our
liturgy is a sacred "work". How we come to that work is probably as
important as the fact that we come. We must recognize that we come to church
for sacred work, sacred worship. This demands a decorum commensurate with
the dignity of the work to be done. Even if that "work" is to utter a
private prayer, it still demands an appropriate decorum.
The
soldiers at Arlington know the sacredness of the work which they do. Their
dress, their demeanor, their discipline all speak of their recognition of
that sacredness. Seeing them is a source of pride for me.
I
am proud of what they represent, proud of the values which their discipline
bespeaks, proud of the country which at heart still knows that honor and
fidelity are worth defending.
For
these values people live, and for these values people give their lives. The
dress and demeanor of these troops says that they truly honor and respect
the life and death of those represented at the Tomb of the Unknown.
Catholics likewise need to know the sacredness of the liturgical "work"
which they do. Their dress, their demeanor, their discipline, ought all to
speak of their recognition of that sacredness.
Seeing the dress and demeanor of Catholics in Church ought to be a source of
pride. They ought to manifest a genuine respect for Jesus present, as well
as for the values of the Catholic Church. For these values, saints, declared
and not declared, gave their lives; for these values each Catholic must be
willing to dress in a fashion which shows recognition and respect.
Bishop Vasa, a native of Lincoln, Nebraska, was made bishop of the Diocese
of Baker, Oregon, in 1999.
This essay originally appeared in the
Catholic
Sentinel June 30, 2000. It is reprinted with permission.
Copyright © 2000 Adoremus: Society for the
Renewal of the Sacred Liturgy