to Colorado Legatus in the refectory of the John Paul II Center
for the New Evangelization
Back in the 1930s,
a young German thinker looked at the political violence in his own country
and wrote the following words of admiration for the United States:
He said, “American
democracy is not founded on the [so-called] emancipated man . . . but
upon the kingdom of God and [the] limitation of all earthly powers by
the sovereignty of God.”
see in America a freedom based on the sanctity of every human person.
see in America a nation founded by people who -- despite all their sins
-- at least understood that the powers of this world are subject to
a higher authority. The men and women who founded America understood
the lessons of Scripture -- that God judges the strong; that
God protects the weak; and that God guarantees the rights
of all persons, beginning with the right to life.
German thinker -- in his own experience, in his own country -- could
contrast the peace and blessings of America with the disaster that happens
when leaders ignore God and begin to decide for themselves who qualifies
as a human person . . . and who does not.
America in 2003 is obviously a long way from Germany in the 1930s.
But later this month, on January 22, we mark the 30th anniversary
of Roe vs. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion
on demand. And the Roe decision, in very many ways, has been a turning
point in our life as a nation. In the space of a few decades, an
act of violence that was condemned as a “crime against humanity” at
the Nuremberg Trials, has become a woman’s “right to choose” -- and
even an act of convenience. So we need to ask ourselves whether we’re
really so far removed from the past as we think.
we’re not, and here’s why: Political systems are organic. They’re ecologies.
Even Benjamin Franklin, who was not a particularly virtuous man, once
wrote that, “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.” Bad laws
and bad court decisions poison the roots of the way we live. They damage
the way we think – and that damage in turn creates more bad laws,
more bad court decisions, and more bad political behavior.
. . and gradually we lose the ability to see what’s right, and to do
what’s good. We lose the ability to recognize and live real freedom.
And that’s where we find ourselves today.
the Supreme Court issued Roe vs. Wade in 1973, it set two distinct
tragedies in motion. First, it legalized abortion on demand. It opened
the floodgates to killing 40 million unborn children, and it wounded
the lives of millions of women and men in the process. Roe put
the definition of human personhood up for grabs. It removed
the unborn from human status -- and in doing so, it set a precedent
that comes back to haunt us in all our debates about infanticide, physician-assisted
suicide and what some hospitals now alarmingly call “inappropriate care”
for the seriously ill.
-- and in a way, just as brutally -- Roe undermined our reasoning
and our moral vocabulary. We’re losing our ability to think clearly
about moral issues. The way abortion supporters misuse the label “pro
choice” simply proves this point. “Pro choice,” as an expression, has
no connection at all with the real, flesh-and-blood event of an abortion.
Abortion always involve a killing. But the language surrounding it
has become sanitized, evasive, and dishonest.
“community” means more than just a social agreement to tolerate each
other’s appetites and alibis. Real community always involves shared
beliefs and a shared commitment to the future. The common good always
demands that individuals sacrifice their own wants and needs for the
good of others. So if we want to renew our public life as a nation,
we need to begin by realizing that abortion, euthanasia, racial and
ethnic prejudice, greed, exploitation of the poor and all the other
acts of violence against human dignity in our day begin right here --
in our own selfishness as private citizens; in our own refusal to live
in a spirit of truth.
Chesterton used to say that “tolerance” is the alibi of people who don’t
believe in anything, and that the point of having an open mind is the
same as having an open mouth: Sooner or latter, it’s supposed to close
on something solid. Chesterton wasn’t preaching the joys of bigotry.
Actually, he was doing just the opposite. As Christians we have the
very serious obligation to show even our enemies charity, justice,
mercy, understanding and respect.
also have the responsibility to do all these things in a spirit of love
and honesty, which means working to serve the truth, and naming and
resisting sin. Real love is always rooted in truth. And we serve the
common good best when we serve the truth best. That’s what Samuel Adams
meant when he wrote that a person “is the truest friend of the liberty
of his country who tries most to promote its virtue.” And that’s what
George Washington meant in his Farewell Address when he warned that,
“reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality
can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”
is made -- and nations are built -- by people who believe in something
zealously and act on it in the public square, not by people who
have a neutrality or even a skepticism toward all belief.
want public officials who act with both intelligence and moral character,
the only way we'll get those qualities is by carrying our religious
faith and moral principles into the public debate -- not just at election
time like last November, but week in and week out, in dialogue with
the people who represent us.
who reads the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution or "The
Federalist Papers," understands that the Founders saw America as
an experiment in ideas and moral principles. The political leader
who claims to be "personally opposed" to abortion and then
votes to protect a so-called right to choose abortion, colludes in the
destruction of innocent human life. Moreover, he’s being untrue to
his own convictions, and therefore is unworthy of public service. The
same applies to each and every one of us as voters.
simultaneously commit ourselves to human rights, and then vote for people
and policies that attack the weakest among us. And as Catholics, we
can’t live our commitment to the sanctity of human life only as a private
piety. People of religious faith need to live their moral witness courageously,
as a matter of public record and civic responsibility -- or we'll
lose our faith even as a matter of private principle.
to remind ourselves that real democracy is almost always impolite.
Real pluralism always involves a degree of conflict. It demands
that people of faith will work tirelessly to advance their deeply held
beliefs about human dignity by every legal, ethical, non-violent method
available to them. For Catholics, this is what it means to
be leaven in society. If we're leaven, we need to offer our culture
the whole truth about the dignity of the human person, even when the
message is unpopular.
get the elected officials we deserve. Their virtue -- or their lack
of it -- is a judgment not only on them, but also on us. Every political
choice we make, also affects the persons we are. Private conviction
is not a separate universe from public life. If we really believe in
Jesus Christ, if we really mean it when we say we’re Catholic, then
that’s the soil from which all our public actions should flower, including
our political choices. When we claim to believe one thing, but act
in the opposite political manner, we choose a kind of schizophrenia.
We contradict ourselves. And the result is the sort of moral confusion
we find in so many elements of our public life today.
with the words of a young German thinker, and I want to return to him
as we close.
young man once wrote that, “There is no clearer indication of the idolization
of death than . . . when big words are spoken of a ‘new man,’ a [better]
world and of a new society which is to be ushered in, and yet all that
is new is the destruction of life . . . “
that the killing of an unborn child “in the mother’s womb is a violation
of the right to live which God has bestowed upon” every person. “To
raise the question [of whether the unborn child is already] a human
being or not, is merely to confuse the issue. The simple fact is that
God certainly intended to create a human being, and that this nascent
human being has been deliberately deprived of his life. And that is
nothing but murder.”
German thinker who wrote these words was Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the great
Lutheran theologian and pastor. Bonhoeffer was martyred by the Third
Reich in April 1945. He gave his life as a witness to his faith in
Jesus Christ, and to the sanctity of the human person.
we can at least live our lives – as believers and as citizens
-- in a way that shares in his witness. And if we do, then the future
we help create will be worthy of our children; of our nation’s best
ideals; and of our identity as a free people.