The Evangelization Station

Best Catholic Links

Search this Site




Mailing List

Pray for Pope Francis

Scroll down for topics

100+ Important Documents in United States History


Apostolic Fathers of the Church

Articles Worth Your Time

 Biographies & Writings of Notable Catholics

Catholic Apologetics

Catholic Calendar

Catholic News Commentary by Michael Voris, S.T.B.

Catholic Perspectives

Catholic Social Teaching


Church Around the World

Small animated flag of The Holy See (State of the Vatican City) graphic for a white background

Church Contacts

  Church Documents

Church History

Church Law

Church Teaching


Doctors of the Church



(Death, Heaven, Purgatory, Hell)

Essays on Science


Fathers of the Church

Free Catholic Pamphlets

 Heresies and Falsehoods

How to Vote Catholic

Let There Be Light

Q & A on the Catholic Faith

Links to Churches and Religions

Links to Newspapers, Radio and Television

Links to Recommended Sites

Links to Specialized Agencies

Links to specialized Catholic News services


General Instruction of the Roman Missal


Marriage & the Family

Modern Martyrs

Mexican Martyrdom

Moral Theology


Pope John Paul II's

Theology of the Body

Movie Reviews (USCCB)

New Age


Parish Bulletin Inserts

Political Issues

Prayer and Devotions



Hope after Abortion

Project Rachel


Help & Information for Men


Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults




The Golden Legend


Vocation Links & Articles


What the Cardinals believe...

World Religions

Pope John Paul II

In Memoriam

John Paul II


Pope Benedict XVI

In Celebration

Visits to this site

Condoms Vs Abstinence   


Over the past twenty years, HIV/AIDS prevention programs have centered on the large-scale distribution of condoms.1 These have been combined with “safe sex” propaganda campaigns aimed at convincing the public that putting a layer of latex between sexual partners can guarantee protection against infection by the HIV/AIDS virus.

Population Services International (PSI), a USAID-funded group, uses aggressive and ubiquitous advertising campaigns to flood the media with a pro-condom message. These “safe sex” campaigns involve, to use PSI’s own martial language, a constant “barrage of radio spots and films shown on television, in cinema halls, and on [PSI’s] fleet of mobile film vans” all extolling the perfect protection afforded by condom usage.2

Over the course of the nineties, USAID shipped approximately 5 billion condoms abroad.3 Billions of others came from the UN Population Fund, the UK’s Overseas Development Agency, and other providers. Yet, despite this flood of condoms into the developing world, the rate of HIV/AIDS infection continued to grow at startling rates. The number of victims increased one thousand-fold, from just over 40 thousand in 1990 to over 40 million in 2000. Why is this?

One answer may be suggested by a review of the scientific evidence on condom effectiveness conducted by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).4 Citing a study by Davis and Weller, NIH postulated that condoms, if consistently and properly used, provide an 85% reduction in HIV/AIDS transmission risk.5 While no one would deny that this reduction in risk is significant, it is far from being the perfect protection promised by the “safe sex” propaganda funded by USAID. Even paved with condoms, the road to promiscuity still leads to death.

The failure of condoms to provide perfect protection against HIV/AIDS is also suggested by studies of condom use for the prevention of pregnancy. Approximately 3% of couples who reported using condoms consistently and correctly (considered “perfect use”) are estimated to experience an unintended pregnancy during the first year of use.6 If sperm can find their way around the latex barrier, then so, presumably, can the AIDS virus.

To further complicate matters, the presumed protection resulting from using a condom may lead to behavioral changes that completely negate the protection. For example, an individual who believes that consistent and correct use of condoms provides near-absolute protection against HIV/AIDS may engage in recklessly promiscuous behavior that they would otherwise avoid. Why? Because they have been led to believe that, by practicing “safe sex,” they are immune from contracting the disease. In this way, the rate of HIV/AIDS transmission may not be reduced at all by the “safe sex” message, but actually increase over time.

A recent article in The Lancet, a premier British medical journal, suggested that a condom-based approach, by creating a false sense of security on the part of users, had not only failed to stop the spread of AIDS, but had actually exacerbated the problem. The authors drew a parallel with the seat belt law, which was projected to dramatically decrease the number of traffic fatalities. Instead, the number of deaths remained roughly the same, as drivers took risks they previously would have avoided because they felt safer.7

Perhaps this is one of the reasons why, despite massive shipments of condoms overseas, the rate of HIV/AIDS infections continues to grow.

Only one African nation has successfully combated the scourge of AIDS. Uganda owes its success in combating AIDS, most health experts agree, chiefly to abstinence. "Uganda's outstanding success really has American heads turning," said Dr. Milton Amayun, World Vision's HIV/AIDS international program representative. "Experts in the U.S. are starting to see the value of teaching people to limit their sexual relationships within the context of marriage."8

Abstinence, not condoms, is the key to stopping the AIDS epidemic in Africa.


  1. There is new evidence suggesting that medical transmission is responsible for most HIV/AIDS in Africa. See PRI Weekly Briefing, “Are Africans Promiscuous Unto Death?” 5:12, 24 April 2003.

  2. PSI Profile: Social Marketing and communications for health, 2-sided flyer on “Bringing Mass Media to Rural Populations through Mobile Video Vans,” November 1994.

  3. USAID, USAID Highlights, 6:4, 1989; USAID, Population, Health and Nutrition Projects Database; note: the volume of USAID condoms shipped overseas is likely smaller than that of the UN Population Fund, which boasts of being the largest international supplier of condoms. Also cited in PRI Review, 13:1, January–February 2003, p. 4.

  4. “Scientific Evidence on Condom Effectiveness for Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Prevention,” National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, 20 July 2001.

  5. Davis, K.R. and Weller, S. C., “The Effectiveness of Condoms in Reducing Heterosexual Transmission of HIV,” Family Planning Perspectives 1999, 31(6):272-279.

  6. Trussell, J., “Contraceptive Efficacy,” In Hatcher, R.A., Et al., (Eds.) Contraceptive Technology, 1998. Chapter 31:779-844, 17th Revised Ed., Ardent Media, New York, NY. Cited in “Scientific Evidence on Condom Effectiveness for Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) Prevention,” p. 10.

  7. John Richens, et al., “Condoms and seat belts: the parallels and the lessons,” The Lancet, Vol. 355, 29 January 2000.

  8. Uganda's "ABC" Approach to AIDS Proven Effective


Mosher, Steve. “Condoms vs. Abstinence.” Population Research Institutel (2003).


Steve W. Mosher is president of the Population Research Institute a non-profit organization dedicated to debunking the myth that the world is overpopulated.

Copyright © 2003 PRI



Copyright © 2004 Victor Claveau. All Rights Reserved