The Evangelization Station

Best Catholic Links


Search this Site


Home


Contact


Feedback


Mailing List


Pray for Pope Francis


Scroll down for topics


100+ Important Documents in United States History


Anti-Catholicism


Apostolic Fathers of the Church


Articles Worth Your Time


 Biographies & Writings of Notable Catholics


Catholic Apologetics


Catholic Calendar


Catholic News Commentary by Michael Voris, S.T.B.


Catholic Perspectives


Catholic Social Teaching


Christology


Church Around the World


Small animated flag of The Holy See (State of the Vatican City) graphic for a white background

Church Contacts


  Church Documents


Church History


Church Law


Church Teaching


Demonology


Doctors of the Church


Ecumenism


Eschatology

(Death, Heaven, Purgatory, Hell)


Essays on Science


Evangelization


Fathers of the Church


Free Catholic Pamphlets


 Heresies and Falsehoods


How to Vote Catholic


Let There Be Light

Q & A on the Catholic Faith


Links to Churches and Religions


Links to Newspapers, Radio and Television


Links to Recommended Sites


Links to Specialized Agencies


Links to specialized Catholic News services


Liturgy

General Instruction of the Roman Missal


Mariology


Marriage & the Family


Modern Martyrs

Mexican Martyrdom


Moral Theology

****

Pope John Paul II's

Theology of the Body


Movie Reviews (USCCB)


New Age


Occult


Parish Bulletin Inserts


Political Issues


Prayer and Devotions


Pro-Life

****

Hope after Abortion

Project Rachel

****

Help & Information for Men

****


Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults


Sacraments


Scripture


Spirituality


The Golden Legend


Vatican


Vocation Links & Articles

 


What the Cardinals believe...


World Religions


Pope John Paul II

In Memoriam


John Paul II

Beatification


Pope Benedict XVI

In Celebration



Visits to this site

REASONS CLERGY GIVE FOR THEIR SILENCE AT THE PULPIT ON NFP


Fr. Matthew Habiger, OSB

 

"Talking about contraception and sterilization would scandalize the children in the congregation. Thus, I canít deal with them at the pulpit.Ē

But Jesus didnít have such reservations. When he was addressing large crowds he talked about sexual sins. Recall the Sermon on the Mount (Mt 5:27). Children are not offended by a teaching on Godís plan for spousal love. Rather, they are the victims of silence at the pulpit. People get hurt when there is confusion about right and wrong, and there is a great confusion today about the moral evil of contraception and sterilization. Children do not understand the language we use when discussing capital punishment, euthanasia, or experimentation on human embryos. They take from a homily what they need. If they have questions, they can ask their parents for an explanation suited to their level of comprehension.

Refusing to address major moral issues at the pulpit, in effect, makes infants of the entire congregation, who often do not know that contraception and sterilization are wrong, and do not understand why they are wrong. Today we have many adults who are seriously immature in the development of their conscience.


"Itís okay to talk about these matters in RCIA, marriage preparation classes and to provide pamphlets on these issues in the vestibule, but not at the pulpit."

But this approach misses the point. "These times call for people who will look the truth in the eye, and call things by their proper names, without yielding to convenient compromise or to the temptation of self-deception" (Evangelium Vitae 57). Important issues cannot be censored from the pulpit. If a message does not happen at the pulpit, it doesnít happen. There is great ignorance among Catholics about the morality of contraception and sterilization. Very few understand why these choices and acts are immoral. Many people think that if a topic is not treated at the pulpit, where it is heard by all, then it is not important and can be ignored. RCIA classes, marriage prep classes, and the pamphlet rack are good ways to supplement teaching from the pulpit, but can never replace it.

 

"These issues are contentious. They will produce strife and discord."

But this means that the priest, as a moral guide, cannot provide moral guidance where it is most needed. If people already understand an issue, like slavery for example, and do not dispute it, then there is no need to address it from the pulpit. But if many people are violating the 5th and 6th Commandments, do not know it, and canít understand why these acts are sinful, then we priests must address the issue. Not to address them is reprehensible negligence on our part. We must inform conscience by proposing moral truth. The approach we use is that of Jesus: we speak the truth in charity, and with conviction and forthrightness. If we allow the Gospel to be silenced because we refuse to accept criticism from those who reject Gospel values, then we fail in our priesthood. It is not our Gospel. We are not at liberty to decide what parts of the Gospel are ďtoo hard to accept,Ē and can be ignored. Contraception and sterilization are serious matters, and they are causing much harm to our marriages, our families and to our young people.


"
Collections will go down."

This is factually untrue. But beyond that, we members of the clergy must anticipate the criteria our Lord will use to evaluate our pastoral care of the flock entrusted to our care. The main criterion will not be "Did you get all the bills paid and have a smooth running operation?" Rather, it will be "Did you guide my people into a knowledge of my ways, my Gospel, and into a love for the splendor of the truth?" Paying bills is not high on the list of pastoral success criteria. The qualities of a CEO are not those of being a priest. Bringing people to the person, heart and mind of the Lord is what is essential. God does not demand success from us in terms of our peopleís response to good moral teaching. He does demand that we faithfully propose and teach the values that comport well with our dignity as bodied persons. Godís plan for human sexuality, marriage and family are an essential part of the Gospel of Life in these times.

Priests who have consistently proposed the values of Humanae Vitae, Familiaris Consortio and Evangelium Vitae will tell you that their collections have not collapsed. Instead, the parish has learned the meaning of a spirit of generosity, and that is reflected in parish contributions as well as volunteer service to various parish organizations. Couples who practice NFP are very often the most generous volunteers in the parish. Couples open to life are also open to giving their children to the priesthood and religious life. If they are caught up in the contraceptive culture, then they will very likely not be generous with God by accepting His invitation to their sons and daughters.

 

"People will go to another church because they donít want to hear this."

Sad to say, not every parish is on the same page when dealing with matters of sexuality, marriage and the family. Some parishes simply ignore whatever is politically incorrect. They allow dissenting elements within the parish to determine what parts of the Gospel can be proclaimed there. This, in turn, means that forces within the secular society exert an influence over some parishioners, who bring that to bear upon the entire parish. Instead of being counter-cultural, such a parish becomes a mere reflection of the secular culture.

But this is the land of the free and the home of the brave. What is there to prevent a clergyman from proclaiming Godís beautiful plan for human love, life, marriage and family? We are not to worry about those who may reject the truth and leave. Our Lord did not change his teaching about the Eucharist when many in His audience found this a hard saying and walked away. He respected their freedom, and let them walk. But they had to respect His freedom also and His responsibility to proclaim the message the Father gave Him, which is for the life of the world. If all the clergy were clearly teaching good moral principles, then our people would not go shopping for the preacher who suits their ears.


"When the bishop talks about it, Iíll begin to talk about it."

One can understand why a priest or deacon would hesitate to take the initiative in teaching values that have been largely ignored since 1968. We have a right to expect our spiritual fathers, the bishops, to lead by their example in addressing these serious matters. This is their duty as moral guides and spiritual leaders of a diocese. They are to be the good shepherd for the entire diocese. But what happens if they do not speak out? Is the pastor justified in keeping silent? When we priests die, the Lord will not ask you "What did the bishop do?" He will ask, "What did you do? You are the pastor of your people."

Our priesthood comes from the Lord, not from another human being. Our obligations go to the Lord, before they go to any of His human representatives. God holds us accountable for what we do, for our choices and actions, and taking responsibility for ourselves and our people. True leadership means that we address the real needs of our times, regardless of what others are not doing. Reprehensible negligence does not justify other reprehensible negligence. Perhaps what needs to be done in a diocese where the bishop chooses not to address these issues is to have many of the clergy give him their assurance that they will support his giving a public teaching. Perhaps the bishop is concerned that if he takes any initiative in these matters, then his clergy will publicly refuse to comply, as happened when Humanae Vitae was first promulgated. Everyone admires leadership, but where will leadership arise? We think that the good Lord expects all of us to be spiritual and moral leaders.

 

"Iím not prepared to speak about these issues because I wasnít trained in the seminary for this."

We find that many clergy are woefully unprepared to address these issues. They have not kept up with their reading and personal ongoing formation in the areas of human sexuality, chastity and marriage. But this is not an acceptable excuse. What other profession would be excused from professional ongoing formation, keeping abreast with contemporary developments in their profession? If medical doctors did not keep themselves updated, they would lose their license to practice medicine. Can it be any different for the clergy?

There are excellent materials available today to help us understand the beauty of Godís plan for human love, and especially marital love. There is Pope John Paul IIís Theology of the Body; there is Christian Personalism. There are the writings of reliable moral theologians. There are the writings, CDs and videotapes of Dr. Janet Smith. There are the testimonies of thousands of married couples that have discovered the blessings that these values have brought into their marriages and families. Two readily available sources for materials on Natural Family Planning and the harms of contraception and sterilization are One More Soul (www.OMSoul.com) and the Couple to Couple League International (www.ccli.org). CCL provides three-day clergy conferences twice a year at Covington, Kentucky. NFP Outreach (www.nfpoutreach.org) helps design and conduct clergy conferences for entire dioceses on the topic of "How to Preach Godís Plan for Marriage and Spousal Love From the Pulpit." There are many good Catholic doctors who are willing to bring their expertise to these conferences. And there are hundreds of married couples that are willing to give their testimonies about the values of NFP in their marriages.

Ignorance was never a good excuse for justifying neglect. And it will not wash today in areas that are so vital to good marriages and happy families.

 

"The recent clergy sex scandals make it impossible for me to talk about sex today. I have no credibility."

The false perception ďYou have no credibilityĒ is very much the intent of some forces in the secular society, which want to muzzle the pulpits on matters of sexual morality. They donít want us to teach about Godís plan for human sexuality. But there is no such thing as a moral vacuum.

If good morality is not being taught, then other varieties of sexual ideology will be taught. We see it today in the push for acceptance of single sex marriages, in advocating ďsafeĒ sex for our young people, and in trivializing committed relationships.

The clergy sex scandals call for greater, not less, emphasis upon sexual morality. If there had been greater clarity on these matters from the pulpit in the past, then everyone would know the standards, which apply to everyone, and we would have been spared much grief. Our young people would not have been victimized. Dioceses would not be in danger of bankruptcy. Respect for the clergy would not be at an all time low. Bishops would not be faulted for their lack of oversight. Scandals erupt when there is no clarity of moral teaching coming from the pulpit. Our times call for more, not less, moral teaching from the pulpit.

Both the clergy and the laity have to clean up their act. The abuse of young people by 1-3% of the clergy is indeed a scandal. The abuse of sexuality by 80% of Catholic couples that are using birth control, or are sterilized, is also a great scandal. Before one group can throw stones at the other, they must first clean up their act. God is chastising his people because of violations against His sexual code. He chastises the clergy by not providing vocations to religious life and the priesthood. He chastises the laity by weak marriages, a 50% divorce rate, lots of unhappiness, and children who bear the brunt of their parentís selfishness. So both the clergy and the laity need to hold the other accountable. We are not beating up on each other; rather, we are confronting the truth together.

The responsibility of the clergy and the religious is to hand on the deposit of the Faith as preached by the Apostles, which includes teaching moral truths. Their duty is to explain why Godís plan is so good for us, and so deserving of our efforts to comply with it. The responsibility of the laity is to integrate good moral principles into their lives and actions. Then they are to take these values out into the broader society, and help shape the culture with these Gospel values. This is part of the new evangelization.

 

ďIf all the priests preached on the issue of NFP, teachers would not be able to handle the volume of people wanting to learn about it.  It would be a disaster!Ē Ė a clergyman in California 

What a felicitous disaster this would be!  Too many people wanting a good thing would lead to more couples volunteering to become trained teachers of NFP.   

I think it is true that, if more priests preached on Godís plan for spousal love, then more couples would be encouraged to live by that plan.  And there would be a greater demand for NFP classes.  More classes could easily be accommodated.  Most teachers of NFP across the nation complain of not having enough clients.  They went through the trouble and expense of getting themselves trained to be competent teachers, only to find that very few priests promote NFP, and make referrals to them. 

The teaching of the values and methodology of NFP is the task of the laity.  But then the laity are 99.9% of the Church.  They are a sleeping lion, just waiting to be summoned to active duty.  This is part of the apostolate of the laity. 

On the other hand, we should not exaggerate the ability of a priest to change his parish overnight from having 85% plus of its couples either contracepting, or sterilized, to become totally in accord with Godís plan for marriage and spousal love.  There has been massive contraception since the arrival of the Pill in the 1960ís, with little resistance offered from most pulpits over that time.  The culture, the media, the pharmaceuticals and the medical profession all promote this profitable product relentlessly.  Many Catholics think that self-control and chastity are obsolete virtues. 

The extensive damage done to couples by contraception and sterilization is becoming more obvious every year.  The utopian dream that the Pill would bring about strong marriages and happy, healthy families is now impossible to uphold. 

The 40th anniversary of Humanae Vitae in 2008 is a perfect time to resume teaching what the Catholic Church has taught for 20 centuries.  As God designed the spousal act, it can only be expressed authentically when there is a total openness to both love and to new life. 

I think that this is a very safe bet to make: if any priest is overwhelmed with requests for NFP classes as a result of his preaching on these values, and cannot find enough teachers, then NFP Outreach will help him have all the teachers he needs within six months. 

 

2) ďThe people are drowning in pornography.  We have to tackle this before we get to contraception and sterilization.Ē  -- Military chaplain in California 

Pornography is a huge problem today, including Catholics.  But pornography is just one of a cluster of problems surrounding marriage and family life.  All these problems have one thing in common: they are all violations of Godís plan for human sexuality.  The natural approach to all these problems is to clearly proclaim Godís plan for us as bodied persons, who are either male or female, fertile and sexual.  This is the reason Pope John Paul II wrote the Theology of the Body. 

Everyone wants to have a strong and loving marriage.  Everyone wants to have a happy, healthy family.  When these two essential components of their lives are impaired or missing, then people are hurting deeply.

People need to hear Godís great plan for marriage, spousal love and family.  They need to know just how beautiful, and attractive, that plan is.  Couples need to know how they can achieve such marriages and families with the combination of Godís grace and their own efforts.  They need to know that there is no problem that they cannot face down, if they are drawing upon the grace of their sacrament and cooperating with it. 

Pornography is a violation of human dignity.  It injures both the guilty party and his or her spouse.  Contraception is a violation of a coupleís act of spousal love.  At the precise moment, which calls for total self-giving and self-surrender, a contracepting person instead expresses self-grasping and self-assertion.  Once a spouse understands what self-sacrificial love is, then he or she can understand what violates this love and therefore what must be resolutely rejected and brought under control. 

The violation of the act of spousal love strikes at the core of a marriage.  A 50% divorce rate today, due largely to contraception with all the reservations and conditions it brings to the relationship, is becoming too obvious to ignore.  It is increasingly more difficult to persist in massive denial about these realities. 

Therefore, padre, I encourage you to clearly address the moral evil of pornography.  But the solution to this is closely related to the solution for all the other violations of the marital relationship, where contraception and sterilization are predominant.  Go to the root of the problem. 

 

 

webmaster  www.evangelizationstation.com

Copyright © 2004 Victor Claveau. All Rights Reserved