Because
Catholicism includes a rich tradition of formal prayer, many accuse Catholics of
praying "in vain repetitions" in spite of the admonitions against them in
Matthew 6:7. In doing so, they intimate that repeated prayers, because of
repetition itself, are "vain" in the sense of being worthless or ineffectual.
First, let it be understood from the get-go:
That
Catholics pray in their own words in addition to formal prayers.
That Catholics
are taught in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (2688) that "the memorization
of basic prayers offers an essential support to the life of prayer, but it is
important to help learners savor their meaning." In other words, formal prayer
isn't (or at least shouldn't be) mindless lip-moving but instead a formal
expression of clearly understood and heartfelt sentiments.
Now, the
people who make these accusations
1 against Catholics
don't understand, apparently:
That the verse
in question reads, in the King James version, "But when ye pray, use not vain
repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for
their much speaking." The operative Greek word here for "vain repetitions"
is battalogeo, or babbling. That is, the heathens had a magical
perception of prayer and thought the more they babbled to their gods, the more
that that god would respond: I Kings 18:26: "And they took the bullock which was
given them, and they dressed it, and called on the name of Baal from morning
even until noon, saying, O Baal, hear us. But there was no voice, nor any that
answered."
That, two verses
after the warning in Matthew against "vain repetitions," Jesus gave us the "Our
Father" prayer which most Protestant Christians pray with no qualms about
praying "in vain." The same command in Luke 11:2 reads: "And he said unto them,
When ye pray, say, Our Father..." -- "when you pray, say..."
That Christ
Himself prayed in repetitions. Matthew 26:44: "And he left them, and went away
again, and prayed the third time, saying the same words". Mark 14:39
reads: "And again he went away, and prayed, and spake the same words."
That the angels
pray repetitiously. Revelation 4:8: "...and they rest not day and night,
saying, Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come."
That God
commanded Moses to tell the Israelites: "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one
LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all
thy soul, and with all thy might. And these words, which I command thee this
day, shall be in thine heart: And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy
children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou
walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up."
(Deuteronomy 6:4-7)
That the Psalms
are nothing but a collection of prayers and litanies which were prayed formally
in the pre-Christian synagogues and early Christian churches, are still prayed
in synagogues and Catholic churches today -- and were even prayed by Christ
from the Cross.
That the liturgy
of the synagogue was (and is) filled with repetition and formalized prayer.
Christ said "use not vain repetitions, as the heathens do". Were the Jews
heathens? They prayed (and still pray) the sh'ma twice a day and, in their
liturgy, the Shemoneh Esrei, the Kaddish, the morning blessings,
the Aleinu, etc. Check out a Jewish siddur (missal) sometime; does it
look more typically Protestant or Catholic?
That hymns are
prayers. Is it "vain" to sing "Amazing Grace" or "The Old Rugged Cross" more
than once?
In addition, the
earliest Christians (being Catholics) understood Christ's words as do modern
Catholics. The 1st century Didache (The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles)
says:
Do not pray
like the hypocrites, but rather as the Lord commanded in His Gospel, like
this:
Our Father
who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done
on earth, as it is in heaven. Give us today our daily bread, and forgive us
our debt as we also forgive our debtors. And bring us not into temptation,
but deliver us from the evil one; for Thine is the power and the glory for
ever..
Pray this
three times each day.
St. John
Chrysostom (A.D. 347 A.D.-407) writes in his Homily 19 on St. Matthew:
You see that
when He was discoursing of almsgiving, He removed only that mischief which
comes of vainglory, and added nothing more; neither did He say whence one
should give alms; as from honest labor, and not from rapine nor
covetousness: this being abundantly acknowledged among all. And also before
that, He had thoroughly cleared up this point, when He blessed them "that
hunger after righteousness."
But touching prayer, He adds somewhat over and above; "not to use vain
repetitions." And as there He derides the hypocrites, so here the heathen;
shaming the hearer everywhere most of all by the vileness of the persons.
For since this, in most cases, is especially biting and stinging, I mean our
appearing to be likened to outcast persons; by this topic He dissuades them;
calling frivolousness, here, by the name of "vain repetition:" as when we
ask of God things unsuitable, kingdoms, and glory, and to get the better of
enemies, and abundance of wealth, and in general what does not at all
concern us.
"For He knoweth," saith He, "what things ye have need of." [Matthew 6:8]
And herewith He seems to me to command in this place, that neither should we
make our prayers long; long, I mean, not in time, but in the number and
length of the things mentioned. For perseverance indeed in the same requests
is our duty: His word being, "continuing instant in prayer." [Romans 12:12]
And He Himself too, by that example of the widow, who prevailed with the
pitiless and cruel ruler, by the continuance of her intercession; and by
that of the friend, who came late at night time, and roused the sleeper from
his bed, not for his friendship's, but for his importunity's sake; what did
He, but lay down a law, that all should continually make supplication unto
Him? He doth not however bid us compose a prayer of ten thousand clauses,
and so come to Him and merely repeat it. For this He obscurely signified
when He said, "They think that they shall be heard for their much speaking."
[Mathew. 6:7]
"For He knoweth," saith He, "what things ye have need of." And if He know,
one may say, what we have need of, wherefore must we pray? Not to instruct
Him, but to prevail with Him; to be made intimate with Him, by continuance
in supplication; to be humbled; to be reminded of thy sins.
So, is it
"repetitions" that are bad or was Our Lord speaking of "vain repetitions,"
vainglory, and frivolousness? Was Our Lord wrong for praying the same prayer
more than once, using the same words, in the Garden of Gethsemani? Are the
angels in Heaven wrong for singing the Sanctus ("Holy, Holy, Holy") all day and
night, without ceasing? Was God making a big mistake when He told Israel to pray
the sh'ma all throughout the day? Are reading the Psalms a waste of time? Have
Israelite, early Christian (Catholic), and modern Jewish, Catholic and Orthodox
liturgists been praying "vainly" for all these millennia, only to be set
straight in the past hundred or so years by sola scriptura Protestants? Is it
wrong to sing hymns that have been sung, verbatim, before?
Or could some Protestants be simply wrong about what Catholics do when praying
formal prayers? What is the context of Matthew 6:7 as seen below?
Matthew 6:1-18
1
Take
heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise
ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven.
2
Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before
thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that
they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their
reward.
3
But when
thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth:
4
That
thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret
himself shall reward thee openly.
5
And when
thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to
pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that
they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
6
But
thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut
thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which
seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
7
But when
ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think
that they shall be heard for their much speaking.
8
Be not
ye therefore like unto them: for your Father knoweth what things ye have
need of, before ye ask him.
9
After
this manner therefore pray ye [Luke 11:2 reads: "And he said unto them,
When ye pray, say, Our Father..."]: Our Father which art in heaven,
Hallowed be thy name.
10
Thy
kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.
11
Give us
this day our daily bread.
12
And
forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.
13
And lead
us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the
kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.
14
For if
ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive
you:
15
But if
ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive
your trespasses.
16
Moreover
when ye fast, be not, as the hypocrites, of a sad countenance: for they
disfigure their faces, that they may appear unto men to fast. Verily I
say unto you, They have their reward.
17
But
thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face;
18
That
thou appear not unto men to fast, but unto thy Father which is in
secret: and thy Father, which seeth in secret, shall reward thee openly.
Good
Sociological and Psychological Reasons for Formal Prayer
Aside from
the liturgical imperative of formalized prayer as rooted in Old Testament
liturgy, memorized prayers are a common language and heritage that help cement
group identity and allow us to worship God corporately. It must always be
remembered that Christianity is the Old Testament religion fulfilled, not some
radical departure that amounted to spiritual anarchy. As far away as modern
Talmudism is from the Old Testament religion, one need only look at modern
religious Jewish practice to get a sense of how formal prayer fit into the
ancient synagogues and daily Jewish life. And one need only look at the Jews
Matthew, Mark, John, Peter, Paul, etc., and the rest of the Church of the first
few centuries, to understand how it is to fit into our modern liturgy and daily
Christian life. We are to pray -- formally and spontaneously -- at all
times without ceasing. Our lives are to be a prayer.
Another benefit of formal prayer is its value in times of crisis. When your
world falls apart, when you find yourself otherwise speechless with pain or
shock or fear, words of prayer memorized in childhood come to the mind and lips
almost as if by instinct. I know a man who was on the USS Liberty when she was
torpedoed and strafed for almost two hours in 1967 off the coast of Gaza. He
told me that some of the the men of that ship gathered on deck to pray the "Our
Father." Charlotte Corday prayed the Rosary just before she was guillotined
during the French Revolution, and I can only imagine how glad those on the
Titanic were to have memorized the Act of Contrition as Father Byles bravely
heard last Confessions just before that ship went down. What a calming thing for
them to have had the Rosary to pray together! The short prayers we call
"ejaculations" -- e.g. "My Jesus, mercy!", "Blessed be God!", "Lord Jesus
Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner" -- are brief words that act as a
"touchstone" in helping to re-focus one's attention toward the Holy during
life's darker moments.
Formal prayers can be thought of, too, as the "phonics" of prayer life. Just as
one learns to read by memorizing the sounds of letters, diphthongs, and
digraphs, one learns to pray by learning the great prayers of those who've gone
before us. They are templates which also act to catechize; the child who learns
the Glory Be 2
learns something about the nature of the Trinity. The child whose parents teach
him the Prayer to Guardian Angel not only learns of God's protecting angelic
emissaries, but of God's goodness itself -- and he falls asleep safe in that
knowledge 3.
Some final thoughts on this topic, gotten off from an Evangelical-Lutheran
website 4:
Could it be
that such scorn [for formalized prayer] is actually an aversion to the very
idea that one must direct his attention to words other than his own? One who
puffs, Why say this again? is in essence complaining that his mind wants
something new to receive, something else. Is this the creative part of the
mind, then? For to create something is to experience something new,
something completely else. Without disparaging creativity altogether—for
there is surely a season for everything— it can hardly be denied that
creating one's own words or thoughts is necessarily opposed to receiving
someone else's words or thoughts. Therefore when the matter at hand is the
Word of God and the importance and command of Christ to meditate thereon
(Search the Scriptures, John 5:39), creativity is quite out of place. We
might even suggest that it was this mischievous desire for creativity that
led to consumption of the forbidden fruit in Eden (as if to say, "We want
something new!" )...
...It is, in short, disobedience to the Sabbath commandment, with its
attendant implication that we gladly hear and learn the Word of God. Now we
can get at the reason the employment of rote ritual in worship is a point in
its favor, even in connection with the wandering of minds. In addition to
the dominical command, rote repetition is a great divider: it helps to
separate the sheep from the goats. The fact that rote ritual is the bane of
some and the blessing of others is not unrelated to the fact that rote
ritual results in the wandering of minds. For in the first place, when the
mind of the contemptuous wanders, it will produce the closing of his mind;
conversely, when the mind of the diligent wanders, this will produce a
self-chiding, and hence a greater desire to concentrate. In fact, such a one
who puts forth the consequent effort to concentrate will quickly find that
he has no difficulty doing so, by virtue of the fact that much rote
repetition is going on, and he already knows what to expect.
This whole process is not unlike the reason Jesus gave for preaching in
parables:
Because they
seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand . . .
For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing,
and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their
eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and
should be converted, and I should heal them. (Matthew 13:14-15)
Why did
Jesus preach in parables, if He knew that some people were already dull of
hearing? His approach contains both grace and judgment: grace for those who
do hear, and implicit judgment against others who refuse, as if He would
say, This message is not for you, then. So His parables served as a
beginning of the separation of the faithful from the hypocrites. For it was
only those who asked, What does this mean? who were told.
So also does rote repetition serve to separate the faithful from the
hypocrites, and in a way to expose the hypocrisy of the latter:
Footnotes: 1 Some anti-liturgical types who accuse Catholics of
praying in "vain repetitions" are also those likely to pray like this: "Father
God, we just ask You, Father God, to bless this food to our bodies [whatever
that means], Father God. And, Father God, please watch over Susie, Father God.
She's experiencing bad health right now, Father God, and we just ask, Father
God, that you send Your Spirit to heal and guide her through these hard times,
Father God. We lift her up [to where?], Father God, and claim, in Jesus' name,
Your healing power, Father God. And, Father God, we just thank You, Father God,
for all You've given us, Father God, and..." well, you get the idea. Some tend
to pray "spontaneously" and "in their own words" by using King James style
English, calling God "Thee" and using words like "unto" and such. And some,
instead of wrapping up a prayer in the usual way, are likely to end with "Amen
and Amen," repeating (gasp!) that concluding "so be it." And how many
millions of copies of the book, "The Prayer of Jabez," were sold to Protestant
Christians -- the book containing a prayer that is to be prayed every day for 30
days to force the vending-machine god to hand out the material goods? The Jabez
prayer reads, "Oh that thou wouldest bless me indeed, and enlarge my coast, and
that thine hand might be with me, and that thou wouldest keep me from evil, that
it may not grieve me!" While the Bible states that Jabez was "more honorable"
than his brethren, the prayer itself, barring the context of Jabez's life
and personality (about which very little is said) and as it's presented to
Protestants as a "good luck charm" to acquire material wealth/health/etc.,
shows a distinct lack of humilty and a "my will be done" attitude. For this
prayer to be singled out as "the most spiritual prayer of the Bible" is
disconcerting, to say the very least.
2 The Glory Be Prayer: "Glory be to the Father, and
to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, as it was in the beginning, is now, and ever
shall be, world without end. Amen."
3 Prayer to Guardian Angel: "Angel of God, my
guardian dear, to whom His love commits me here, ever this night be at my side,
to light and guard, to rule and guide. Amen."